News :: Politics

Larry Craig takes ’Wide Stance’ on Infamous Bathroom Visit

by John Miller
Monday Aug 6, 2012
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (8)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL

BOISE, Idaho (AP) - Former Republican U.S. Sen. Larry Craig aims to fend off a federal election lawsuit against him by arguing his infamous June 11, 2007, Minneapolis airport bathroom visit that ended in his sex-sting arrest was part of his official Senate business.

Craig is hoping to avoid repaying $217,000 in campaign funds the Federal Election Commission claims he misused to defend himself.

The FEC sued Craig in June in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., alleging he converted the campaign money to personal use by spending it on his legal defense after he was accused of soliciting sex in a Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport bathroom. The commission argues Craig’s defense had no connection to his campaign for federal office.

Craig counters that money tied to his airport bathroom trip was for neither personal use nor his campaign, but fell under his official, reimbursable duties as senator because he was traveling between Idaho and the nation’s capital for work.

He cites a U.S. Senate rule in which reimbursable per diem expenses include all charges for meals, lodging, hotel fans, cleaning, pressing of clothing - and bathrooms.

"Not only was the trip itself constitutionally required, but Senate rules sanction reimbursement for any cost relating to a senator’s use of a bathroom while on official travel," wrote Andrew Herman, Craig’s lawyer in Washington, D.C., in documents filed Thursday.

In its complaint, the FEC contends the three-term U.S. senator’s campaign account, Craig for U.S. Senate, paid at least $139,952 to the law firm Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan in Washington, D.C., and $77,032 to Kelly & Jacobson in Minnesota for legal services related to his guilty plea to disorderly conduct.

An undercover officer said Craig tapped his feet and signaled under a stall divider that he wanted sex.

Regulators voted unanimously in May to pursue the complaint against Craig after informal negotiations failed. They are seeking repayment of the money, as well as fines of up to $6,500 from the former senator and his treasurer, Kaye O’Riordan.

Contacted Friday, FEC spokeswoman Judith Ingram cited pending litigation and declined to comment on the case.

Craig didn’t return a phone call Friday to his lobbying firm, New West Strategies.

In documents supporting his bid to have the complaint dismissed, Craig cites the case of former U.S. Rep. Jim Kolbe of Arizona, who tapped campaign money in 2006 to defend himself after allegations of improper behavior emerged against him following a Grand Canyon rafting trip with two former male pages.

The trip by Kolbe, the second openly gay Republican to serve in Congress, was an official visit with support provided by the National Park Service.

The FEC concluded that Kolbe’s use of the campaign money to pay legal expenses associated with a Department of Justice inquiry regarding the trip were "ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in connection with his duty as a House member."

Craig’s lawyer argues that his airport bathroom visit, made while traveling back to Washington, D.C., from his home state, should be seen similarly - and the FEC complaint dismissed with prejudice.

"Simply put, no principled distinction can be drawn between the Kolbe matter and this case," Herman contends. "Sen. Craig’s legal expenses arose during official Senate travel, an activity that was part of his constitutionally enumerated duties as a holder of federal office."

Watch Larry Craig’s press conference following his arrest in 2007:


Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Comments

  • Oh Jed said:, 2012-08-04 14:15:50

    It’s called karma Larry. You’ll have to swap the rest area mensroom for the one at the courthouse. Tap, Tap, Tap.


  • WayGay, 2012-08-06 04:16:07

    I don’t know who to feel sorry for, Larry’s stupid wife who ignores her husband is a lying closet case; or the people of his state who buried their heads in the sand during this whole scandal. It’s ignorant self-loathing gays like Craig that are the root cause of all the gay hatred. They feel they can deflect attention from their own psychological disorder (as deceitful sociopaths) and make normal LGBTs bear the burden of their own shortcomings.


  • Wayne M., 2012-08-07 21:31:17

    Larry Craig’s nose is growing. If he had any decency, he would admit he is sexually attracted to men and then do some work to help LGBT people achieve equality.


  • dangnad, 2012-08-07 21:52:13

    When Edge says "wide stance", what do you mean? The definition of "stance" is ’standing posture’.


  • Oh Jed said:, 2012-08-07 22:00:06

    My guess would be a tongue in cheek reference to his sitting on the toilet with his legs spread wide. This way his shoes would encroach beyond the perceived floor zone created by the partition into the neighboring stalls.


  • dangnad, 2012-08-07 23:56:43

    Oh Jed, you said "sitting".


  • Oh Jed said:, 2012-08-08 00:02:35

    Lol... You can take a "stance" as well as a stand while standing or sitting. :)


  • dangnad, 2012-08-08 00:59:28

    LOL, yeah. All of this has to do with the straight (e.g. Jon Stewart) misunderstanding as to what happened in Minn. airport. Craig assumed no stance, neither at the urinal nor in the stall. While in the stall, he moved one foot over toward the next stall (all of this in the vice cop’s report) as a "signal". That was when he was busted. This is all pretty trivial when you think that Larry Craig becomes more and more foolish as time goes on.


Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook