News :: National

New Study Finds That Your Mother Made You Gay

by Winnie McCroy
EDGE Editor
Saturday Feb 15, 2014
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (4)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL
Thanks, Mom!
Thanks, Mom!  

A new study of gay men in the U.S. has found that male sexual orientation is influenced by genes passed on by the mother.

The British newspaper the Guardian reports that in a test of 400 gay men, genes on at least two chromosomes affected whether a man is gay.

"The study shows that there are genes involved in male sexual orientation," said Michael Bailey, a psychologist at Northwestern University in Illinois, who set out the findings at a discussion event held in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago.

Bailey has not yet published the work, but said it confirmed the findings of a smaller study that sparked widespread controversy in 1993, when Dean Hamer of the U.S. National Cancer found that more than 10 percent of brothers of gay men were gay themselves, compared to around 3 percent of the general population.

The U.K.’s Telegraph reports that no similar genes have been discovered which influence lesbianism.

"Nobody has found something like this in women," said Daryl Bem, a social psychologist at Cornell University.

Researchers have speculated in the past that genes linked to homosexuality in men may have survived evolution because they happened to make women who carried them more fertile. This may be the case for genes in the Xq28 region, as the X chromosome is passed down to men exclusively from their mothers.

Hamer found that 33 out of 40 gay brothers inherited similar genetic markers on the Xq28 region of the X chromosome, suggesting key genes resided there. He faced a firestorm when his study was published, over the question of nature verses nurture, as well as the prospect of a prenatal test for sexual orientation. At that time, Hamer warned that any attempt to develop a test for homosexuality would be "wrong, unethical and a terrible abuse of research."

Similarly, before these latest results were made public, one of Bailey’s colleagues, Alan Sanders, said the findings could not and should not be used to develop a test for sexual orientation.

"When people say there’s a gay gene, it’s an oversimplification," Sanders said. "There’s more than one gene, and genetics is not the whole story. Whatever gene contributes to sexual orientation, you can think of it as much as contributing to heterosexuality as much as you can think of it contributing to homosexuality. It contributes to a variation in the trait."

Bailey added that while genes play a role, so do multiple other factors including hormone levels in the womb.

"Sexual orientation has nothing to do with choice," said Bailey. "We found evidence for two sets [of genes] that affect whether a man is gay or straight. But it is not completely determinative; there are certainly other environmental factors involved."

Winnie McCroy is the Women on the EDGE Editor, HIV/Health Editor, and Assistant Entertainment Editor for EDGE Media Network, handling all women’s news, HIV health stories and theater reviews throughout the U.S. She has contributed to other publications, including The Village Voice, Gay City News, Chelsea Now and The Advocate, and lives in Brooklyn, New York, where she writes about local restaurants in her food blog, http://brooklyniscookin.blogspot.com/

Comments

  • Anonymous, 2014-02-16 09:40:37

    Just wonderingand who passes on the lesbian gene. Why do these so called studies only focus on the male gay


  • Anonymous, 2014-02-16 11:47:25

    The term "Homosexual" is not an approved term by the American Psychological Association, which makes it politically incorrect to use for professional publications. Please see the APA Handbook concerning gay related terms.


  • Anonymous, 2014-02-16 12:05:14

    So, he basically came under fire for all of those narcississtic bigots who want to feel like others are bad parents for having gay kids. Nice.


  • fleebness, 2014-02-17 07:04:52

    The APA does not strike the use of the word "homosexuality", and in fact uses it in their own text. This can be verified online with a simple search. As that is the closest word to "homosexual" used in this article, either the article has been edited, or anonymous is being a tad hypersensitive.Personally, I don’t take offense to either word. And I certainly think it’s a ridiculous burden on writers to come up with some long expression for homosexuality than to simply write "homosexuality".I can come up with other gripes about the Edge’s journalistic standards than to quibble about this word... Like their occasional extreme bias in their articles. They are always pro-gay, which is fine, but sometimes the writing is so biased I get concerned about the article’s authenticity.


Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook